U.N. official slams U.S. as 'stingy' over aid - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics - December 28, 2004Once again we see the contempt of the UN. The US is hated for our wealth and success. We offer more aid to more disaster hit areas of the world (and for all of you liberals out there aid=charity) and it is never enough.
For many US critics around the world, only the economic devestation of our country will make them happy. They want us to beg for assitance from them, to need them. They resent the fact that we don't.
They have the audacity to suggest that we raise taxes so that
"...there would be more available if taxes were raised".And to further show their greed, jealousy and resentment they say:
"There are several donors who are less generous than before in a growing world economy," he said, adding that politicians in the United States and Europe "believe that they are really burdening the taxpayers too much, and the taxpayers want to give less. It's not true. They want to give more."Taxpayers in our country are
FREE to give as much over their already too high tax burden as they would like. If they want to give more in our country, they are
FREE to do so. What this idiot that is quoted in this article cannot grasp is the difference between
GIVE and
TAKE.Citizens of a
FREE country
GIVE to help others. This is called
CHARITY. Governments
TAKE (often by force) from their
CITIZENS to help the government. This is called
STEALING (for you liberals out there this is also referred to as taxation).
Is the UN really relevant when they cannot grasp the difference between give and take? When they advocate teh theft of property by force to reallocate wealth around the world at their discretion and political whim?
The UN is anti-American and they are dangerous.
